4.5 Article

Uncoupling of eNOS causes superoxide anion production and impairs NO signaling in the cerebral microvessels of hph-1 mice

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY
卷 122, 期 6, 页码 1211-1218

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2012.07872.x

关键词

cerebral microvasculature; endothelial dysfunction; GTP cyclohydrolase I; oxidative stress

资金

  1. American Heart Association [08-35436N]
  2. National Institutes of Health [HL 91867, HL111062]
  3. Mayo Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

J. Neurochem. (2012) 122, 12111218. Abstract In this study, we used the GTP cyclohydrolase I-deficient mice, i.e., hyperphenylalaninemic (hph-1) mice, to test the hypothesis that the loss of tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4) in cerebral microvessels causes endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) uncoupling, resulting in increased superoxide anion production and inhibition of endothelial nitric oxide signaling. Both homozygous mutant (hph-1-/-) and heterozygous mutant (hph-1+/- mice) demonstrated reduction in GTP cyclohydrolase I activity and reduced bioavailability of BH4. In the cerebral microvessels of hph-1+/- and hph-1-/- mice, increased superoxide anion production was inhibited by supplementation of BH4 or NOS inhibitor- L- NG-nitro arginine-methyl ester, indicative of eNOS uncoupling. Expression of 3-nitrotyrosine was significantly increased, whereas NO production and cGMP levels were significantly reduced. Expressions of antioxidant enzymes namely copper and zinc superoxide dismutase, manganese superoxide dismutase, and catalase were not affected by uncoupling of eNOS. Reduced levels of BH4, increased superoxide anion production, as well as inhibition of NO signaling were not different between the microvessels of male and female mice. The results of our study are the first to demonstrate that, regardless of gender, reduced BH4 bioavailability causes eNOS uncoupling, increases superoxide anion production, inhibits eNOS/cGMP signaling, and imposes significant oxidative stress in the cerebral microvasculature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据