4.5 Article

Neuroprotective actions of Glucagon-like peptide-1 in differentiated human neuroprogenitor cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY
卷 123, 期 6, 页码 919-931

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/jnc.12036

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; apoptosis; CREB; glucagon-like peptide-1; human neuroprogenitor cells; signal transduction

资金

  1. Veterans Administration [NEUD-004-07F]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1)-based therapies are currently available for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, based on their actions on pancreatic beta cells. GLP-1 is also known to exert neuroprotective actions. To determine its mechanism of action, we developed a neuron-rich cell culture system by differentiating human neuroprogenitor cells in the presence of a combination of neurotrophins and retinoic acid. The neuronal nature of these cells was characterized by neurogenesis pathway-specific array. GLP-1 receptor expression was seen mainly in the neuronal population. Culture of neurons in the presence of A beta oligomers resulted in the induction of apoptosis as shown by the activation of caspase-3 and caspase-6. Exendin-4, a long-acting analog of GLP-1, protected the neurons from apoptosis induced by A beta oligomers. Exendin-4 stimulated cyclic AMP response element binding protein phosphorylation, a regulatory step in its activation. A transient transfection assay showed induction of a reporter linked to CRE site-containing human brain-derived neurotrophic factor promoter IV, by the growth factor through multiple signaling pathways. The anti-apoptotic action of exendin-4 was lost following down-regulation of cAMP response element binding protein. Withdrawal of neurotrophins resulted in the loss of neuronal phenotype of differentiated neuroprogenitor cells, which was prevented by incubation in the presence of exendin-4. Diabetes is a risk factor in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease. Our findings suggest that GLP-1-based therapies can decrease the incidence of Alzheimer's disease among aging diabetic population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据