4.5 Article

Lysosomal accumulation of Trk protein in brain of GM1-gangliosidosis mouse and its restoration by chemical chaperone

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY
卷 118, 期 3, 页码 399-406

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2011.07310.x

关键词

chemical chaperone; G(M1)-gangliosidosis; lysosome; neurodegeneration; Trk receptor

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Science, Sports and Technology of Japan [13680918, 14207106, 18390299, 20790728, 21659257]
  2. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan [H17-Kokoro-019, H20-Kokoro-022]
  3. Japan Health Sciences Foundation
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22390207, 18390299, 13680918, 14207106, 23591498, 21659257, 20790728] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

G(M1)-gangliosidosis is a fatal neurodegenerative disorder caused by deficiency of lysosomal acid beta-galactosidase (beta-gal). Accumulation of its substrate ganglioside G(M1) (G(M1)) in lysosomes and other parts of the cell leads to progressive neurodegeneration, but underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Previous studies demonstrated an essential role for interaction of G(M1) with tropomyosin receptor kinase (Trk) receptors in neuronal growth, survival and differentiation. In this study we demonstrate accumulation of G(M1) in the cell-surface rafts and lysosomes of the beta-gal knockout (beta-gal(-/-) mouse brain association with accumulation of Trk receptors and enhancement of its downstream signaling. Immunofluorescence and subcellular fractionation analysis revealed accumulation of Trk receptors in the late endosomes/lysosomes of the beta-gal(-/-) mouse brain and their association with ubiquitin and p62. Administration of a chemical chaperone to beta-gal(-/-) mouse expressing human mutant R201C protein resulted in a marked reduction of intracellular storage of G(M1) and phosphorylated Trk. These findings indicate that G(M1) accumulation in rafts causes activation of Trk signaling, which may participate in the pathogenesis of G(M1)-gangliosidosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据