4.5 Article

Noradrenaline activation of neurotrophic pathways protects against neuronal amyloid toxicity

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY
卷 113, 期 3, 页码 649-660

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.06622.x

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; amyloid; locus coeruleus; neuroprotection; neurotrophin; noradrenaline

资金

  1. NIH [AG26032, AG10688]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

P>Degeneration of locus coeruleus (LC) noradrenergic forebrain projection neurons is an early feature of Alzheimer's disease. The physiological consequences of this phenomenon are unclear, but observations correlating LC neuron loss with increased Alzheimer's disease pathology in LC projection sites suggest that noradrenaline (NA) is neuroprotective. To investigate this hypothesis, we determined that NA protected both hNT human neuronal cultures and rat primary hippocampal neurons from amyloid-beta (A beta(1-42) and A beta(25-35)) toxicity. The noradrenergic co-transmitter galanin was also effective at preventing A beta-induced cell death. NA inhibited A beta(25-35)-mediated increases in intracellular reactive oxygen species, mitochondrial membrane depolarization, and caspase activation in hNT neurons. NA exerted its neuroprotective effects in these cells by stimulating canonical beta(1) and beta(2) adrenergic receptor signaling pathways involving the activation of cAMP response element binding protein and the induction of endogenous nerve growth factor (NGF) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). Treatment with functional blocking antibodies for either NGF or BDNF blocked NA's protective actions against A beta(1-42) and A beta(25-35) toxicity in primary hippocampal and hNT neurons, respectively. Taken together, these data suggest that the neuroprotective effects of noradrenergic LC afferents result from stimulating neurotrophic NGF and BDNF autocrine or paracrine loops via beta adrenoceptor activation of the cAMP response element binding protein pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据