4.5 Article

Evidence that pregabalin reduces neuropathic pain by inhibiting the spinal release of glutamate

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY
卷 113, 期 2, 页码 552-561

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.06625.x

关键词

chronic constriction injury; formalin test; hyperalgesia; in vivo microdialysis; neuropathy; nociception

资金

  1. Pfizer Corporation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pregabalin is an anti-convulsant that successfully treats many neuropathic pain syndromes, although the mechanism of its anti-hyperalgesic action remains elusive. This study aims to help delineate pregabalin's anti-hyperalgesic mechanisms. We assessed the effectiveness of pregabalin at decreasing mechanical and cold hypersensitivity induced in a rat model of neuropathic pain. Thus, we compared the effectiveness of pre- or post-treatment with systemic or intrathecal (i.t.) pregabalin at reducing the development and maintenance of the neuropathic pain symptoms. Pregabalin successfully decreased mechanical and cold hypersensitivity, as a pretreatment, but was less effective at suppressing cold hypersensitivity when administered as a post-treatment. Furthermore, both i.t. and systemic administration of pregabalin were effective in reducing the behavioral hypersensitivity, with the exception of systemic post-treatment on cold hypersensitivity. We also examined pregabalin's effects at inhibiting hind paw formalin-induced nociception in naive rats and formalin-induced release of excitatory amino acids in the spinal cord dorsal horn (SCDH) both in naive rats and in rats with neuropathic pain. Pregabalin dose-dependently reduced nociceptive scores in the formalin test. We also present the first evidence that pregabalin reduces the formalin-induced release of glutamate in SCDH. Furthermore, i.t. pregabalin reduces the enhanced noxious stimulus-induced spinal release of glutamate seen in neuropathic rats. These data suggest that pregabalin reduces neuropathic pain symptoms by inhibiting the release of glutamate in the SCDH.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据