4.4 Review

Tracking the primary photoconversion events in rhodopsins by ultrafast optical spectroscopy

期刊

PHOTOCHEMICAL & PHOTOBIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 14, 期 2, 页码 213-228

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1039/c4pp00370e

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Research Council Advanced Grant STRATUS (ERC-AdG) [291198]
  2. PSMN (Pole Scientifique de Modelisation Numerique) computing center of ENS de Lyon

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Opsins are a broad class of photoactive proteins, found in all classes of living beings from bacteria to higher animals, which work either as light-driven ion pumps or as visual pigments. The photoactive function in opsins is triggered by the ultrafast isomerization of the retinal chromophore around a specific carbon double bond, leading to a highly distorted, spectrally red-shifted photoproduct. Understanding, by either experimental or computational methods, the time course of this photoisomerization process is of utmost importance, both for its biological significance and because opsin proteins are the blueprint for molecular photoswitches. This paper focuses on the ultrafast 11-cis to all-trans isomerization in visual rhodopsins, and has a twofold goal: (i) to review the most recent experimental and computational efforts aimed at exposing the very early phases of photoconversion; and (ii) discuss future advanced experiments and calculations that will allow an even deeper understanding of the process. We present high time resolution pump-probe data, enabling us to follow the wavepacket motion through the conical intersection connecting excited and ground states, as well as femtosecond stimulated Raman scattering data allowing us to track the subsequent structural evolution until the first stable all-trans photoproduct is reached. We conclude by introducing computational results for two-dimensional electronic spectroscopy, which has the potential to provide even greater detail on the evolution of the electronic structure of retinal during the photoisomerization process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据