4.5 Article

Limited role of the c-Jun N-terminal kinase pathway in a neonatal rat model of cerebral hypoxia-ischemia

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY
卷 108, 期 3, 页码 552-562

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2008.05797.x

关键词

hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy; mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway; neuroprotection; newborn; peptides; rat

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) [3100AO- 105824]
  2. Grant of the Eagle Foundation, Switzerland
  3. Faculty of Biology and Medicine of the University of Lausanne, Switzerland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

D-JNKI1, a cell-permeable peptide inhibitor of the c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) pathway, has been shown to be a powerful neuroprotective agent after focal cerebral ischemia in adult mice and young rats. We have investigated the potential neuroprotective effect of D-JNKI1 and the involvement of the JNK pathway in a neonatal rat model of cerebral hypoxia-ischemia (HI). Seven-day-old rats underwent a permanent ligation of the right common carotid artery followed by 2 h of hypoxia (8% oxygen). Treatment with D-JNKI1 (0.3 mg/kg intraperitoneally) significantly reduced early calpain activation, late caspase 3 activation and, in the thalamus, autophagosome formation, indicating an involvement of JNK in different types of cell death: necrotic, apoptotic, and autophagic. However, the size of the lesion was unchanged. Further analysis showed that neonatal HI induced an immediate decrease in JNK phosphorylation (reflecting mainly JNK1 phosphorylation) followed by a slow progressive increase (including JNK3 phosphorylation 54 kDa), whereas c-jun and c-fos expression were both strongly activated immediately after HI. In conclusion, unlike in adult ischemic models, JNK is only moderately activated after severe cerebral HI in neonatal rats and the observed positive effects of D-JNKI1 are insufficient to give neuroprotection. Thus, for perinatal asphyxia, D-JNKI1 can only be considered in association with other therapies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据