4.5 Article

Restored degradation of the Alzheimer's amyloid-β peptide by targeting amyloid formation

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY
卷 108, 期 5, 页码 1198-1207

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.05870.x

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; amyloid-beta; oligomer; proteolysis; therapeutic; zinc

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) [400202]
  2. University of Melbourne Early Career Researcher Grant Scheme [500144]
  3. NHMRC RD Wright Fellow
  4. NHMRC Senior Research Fellow

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Accumulation of neurotoxic amyloid-beta (A beta) is central to the pathology of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Elucidating the mechanisms of A beta accumulation will therefore expedite the development of A beta-targeting AD therapeutics. We examined activity of an A beta-degrading protease (matrix metalloprotease 2) to investigate whether biochemical factors consistent with conditions in the AD brain contribute to A beta accumulation by altering A beta sensitivity to proteolytic degradation. An A beta amino acid mutation found in familial AD, A beta interactions with zinc (Zn), and increased A beta hydrophobicity all strongly prevented A beta degradation. Consistent to all of these factors is the promotion of specific A beta aggregates where the protease cleavage site, confirmed by mass spectrometry, is inaccessible within an amyloid structure. These data indicate decreased degradation due to amyloid formation initiates A beta accumulation by preventing normal protease activity. Zn also prevented A beta degradation by the proteases neprilysin and insulin degrading enzyme. Treating Zn-induced A beta amyloid with the metal-protein attenuating compound clioquinol reversed amyloid formation and restored the peptide's sensitivity to degradation by matrix metalloprotease 2. This provides new data indicating that therapeutic compounds designed to modulate A beta-metal interactions can inhibit A beta accumulation by restoring the catalytic potential of A beta-degrading proteases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据