4.5 Article

The association of metabotropic glutamate receptor type 5 with the neuronal Ca2+-binding protein 2 modulates receptor function

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY
卷 111, 期 2, 页码 555-567

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.06348.x

关键词

G protein-coupled receptor regulatory proteins; hippocampus; mGlu(5) receptor; neuronal Ca2+ binding 2; protein-protein interaction

资金

  1. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion [SAF2008-01462, CSD2008-00005]
  2. Sociedad Espanola de Farmacologia and Laboratorios Almirall
  3. Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnologia [SAF2005-00170, SAF2006-05481, BFU-2006-01896]
  4. Fundacio La Marato de TV3 [060110]
  5. Consejeria de Ciencia y Tecnologia de la Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha [PAI08-0174-6967]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) receptors mediate in part the CNS effects of glutamate. These receptors interact with a large array of intracellular proteins in which the final role is to regulate receptor function. Here, using co-immunoprecipitation and pull-down experiments we showed a close and specific interaction between mGlu(5) receptor and NECAB2 in both transfected human embryonic kidney cells and rat hippocampus. Interestingly, in pull-down experiments increasing concentrations of calcium drastically reduced the ability of these two proteins to interact, suggesting that NECAB2 binds to mGlu(5) receptor in a calcium-regulated manner. Immunoelectron microscopy detection of NECAB2 and mGlu(5) receptor in the rat hippocampal formation indicated that both proteins are codistributed in the same subcellular compartment of pyramidal cells. In addition, the NECAB2/mGlu(5) receptor interaction regulated mGlu(5b)-mediated activation of both inositol phosphate accumulation and the extracellular signal-regulated kinase/mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. Overall, these findings indicate that NECAB2 by its physical interaction with mGlu(5b) receptor modulates receptor function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据