4.5 Article

Dopamine transporter relation to levodopa-derived synaptic dopamine in a rat model of Parkinson's: an in vivo imaging study

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY
卷 109, 期 1, 页码 85-92

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.05904.x

关键词

dopamine kinetics; dopamine transporter; Parkinson's disease; positron emission tomography; rat model; regulatory changes

资金

  1. CIHR
  2. NSERC
  3. MSFHR
  4. CRC
  5. James A. Moore Chair
  6. TRIUMF Life Science

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Studies showed that the dopamine (DA) transporter (DAT) modulates changes in levodopa-derived synaptic dopamine levels (Delta(DA)) in Parkinson's disease (PD). Here we evaluate the relationship between DAT and Delta(DA) in the 6-hydroxydopamine model of Parkinson's disease to investigate these mechanisms as a function of dopaminergic denervation and in relation to other denervation-induced regulatory changes. 27 rats with a unilateral 6-hydroxydopamine lesion (denervation similar to 20-97%) were imaged with C-11-dihydrotetrabenazine (VMAT2 marker), C-11-methylphenidate (DAT marker) and C-11-raclopride (D2-type receptor marker). For denervation < 75%Delta(DA) was significantly correlated with a combination of relatively preserved terminal density and lower DAT. For denervation < 90%, Delta(DA) was significantly negatively correlated with DAT with a weaker dependence on VMAT2. For the entire data set, no dependence on pre-synaptic markers was observed; Delta(DA) was significantly positively correlated with C-11-raclopride binding-derived estimates of DA loss. These findings parallel observations in humans, and show that (i) regulatory changes attempt to normalize synaptic DA levels (ii) a lesion-induced functional dependence of Delta(DA) on DAT occurs up to similar to 90% denervation (iii) for denervation < 75% relative lower DAT levels may relate to effective compensation; for higher denervation, lower DAT levels likely contribute to oscillations in synaptic DA associated with dyskinesias.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据