4.5 Article

Human ProNGF: biological effects and binding profiles at TrkA, P75NTR and sortilin

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY
卷 107, 期 4, 页码 1124-1135

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2008.05698.x

关键词

nerve growth factor; neurotrophin; p75(NTR); pro nerve growth factor; sortilin; tyrosine kinase receptor A

资金

  1. Alzheimer's disease and Care of the Elderly (BRACE)
  2. Sigmund Gestetner Senior Research Fellow
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/D013232/2] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. BBSRC [BB/D013232/2] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nerve growth factor (NGF) promotes cell survival via binding to the tyrosine kinase receptor A (TrkA). Its precursor, proNGF, binds to p75(NTR) and sortilin receptors to initiate apoptosis. Current disagreement exists over whether proNGF acts neurotrophically following binding to TrkA. As in Alzheimer's disease the levels of proNGF increase and TrkA decrease, it is important to clarify the properties of proNGF. Here, wild-type and cleavage-resistant mutated forms (M) of proNGF were engineered and their binding characteristics determined. M-proNGF and NGF bound to p75(NTR) with similar affinities, whilst M-proNGF had a lower affinity than NGF for TrkA. M-proNGF behaved neurotrophically, albeit less effectively than NGF. M-proNGF addition resulted in phosphorylation of TrkA and ERK1/2, and in PC12 cells elicited neurite outgrowth and supported cell survival. Conversely, M-proNGF addition to cultured cortical neurons initiated caspase 3 cleavage. Importantly, these biological effects were shown to be mediated by unprocessed M-proNGF. Surprisingly, binding of the pro region alone to TrkA, at a site other than that of NGF, caused TrkA and ERK1/2 phosphorylation. Our data show that M-proNGF stimulates TrkA to a lesser degree than NGF, suggesting that in Alzheimer brain the increased proNGF : NGF and p75(NTR) : TrkA ratios may permit apoptotic effects to predominate over neurotrophic effects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据