4.5 Article

Non-invasive quantification of brain glycogen absolute concentration

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY
卷 107, 期 5, 页码 1414-1423

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2008.05717.x

关键词

(13)C; insulin; nuclear magnetic resonance; turnover

资金

  1. 'Centre d'Imagerie Biomedicale' (CIBM)
  2. University of Lausanne (UNIL)
  3. Federal Institute of Technology in Lausanne (EPFL)
  4. University of Geneva (UniGe)
  5. Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois' (CHUV)
  6. 'Hopitaux Universitaires Genevois' (HUG)
  7. Leenards and the Jeantet Foundations
  8. NIH [R01NS042005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The only currently available method to measure brain glycogen in vivo is (13)C NMR spectroscopy. Incorporation of (13)C-labeled glucose (Glc) is necessary to allow glycogen measurement, but might be affected by turnover changes. Our aim was to measure glycogen absolute concentration in the rat brain by eliminating label turnover as variable. The approach is based on establishing an increased, constant (13)C isotopic enrichment (IE). (13)C-Glc infusion is then performed at the IE of brain glycogen. As glycogen IE cannot be assessed in vivo, we validated that it can be inferred from that of N-acetyl-aspartate IE in vivo: After [1-(13)C]-Glc ingestion, glycogen IE was 2.2 +/- 0.1 fold that of N-acetyl-aspartate (n = 11, R(2) = 0.77). After subsequent Glc infusion, glycogen IE equaled brain Glc IE ( n = 6, paired t-test, p = 0.37), implying isotopic steady-state achievement and complete turnover of the glycogen molecule. Glycogen concentration measured in vivo by (13)C NMR (mean +/- SD: 5.8 +/- 0.7 mu mol/g) was in excellent agreement with that in vitro (6.4 +/- 0.6 mu mol/g, n = 5). When insulin was administered, the stability of glycogen concentration was analogous to previous biochemical measurements implying that glycogen turnover is activated by insulin. We conclude that the entire glycogen molecule is turned over and that insulin activates glycogen turnover.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据