4.5 Article

Secondary intramedullary spinal cord non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY
卷 107, 期 3, 页码 575-580

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11060-011-0781-4

关键词

Lymphoma; Spinal cord; Secondary; Intramedullary; Metastatic

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intramedullary spinal cord metastases of solid neoplasms are associated with poor long-term survival. As the characteristics of secondary intramedullary spinal cord non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) are not well understood, we sought to describe its clinical features and outcome. We retrospectively reviewed the Mayo Clinic patient database, lymphoma database, and pathology records from 1996 to 2010 and identified patients with clinical myelopathy and neuroimaging evidence of secondary intramedullary spinal cord involvement from pathologically confirmed systemic NHL. Seven patients were included in this study. The median age was 61 years (range, 41-81). Symptom onset was subacute (<= 8 weeks) in six. Four patients were wheelchair-dependent at diagnosis. Spinal cord NHL was diagnosed by cerebrospinal fluid cytology in four; Positron emission tomography hypermetabolism in two; or MRI features alone. Myelopathy developed in five patients at a median 8 months (range, 1-58) following systemic NHL diagnosis, while myelopathy was the heralding symptom of NHL in two patients. Spinal cord MRI lesions were characteristically gadolinium enhancing and expansile. Four patients had co-existing MRI brain lesions. Six patients had B-cell NHL and one patient T-cell NHL. Six of the seven were treated (high dose intravenous methotrexate in three; radiation therapy in two; and R-CHOP in one). Median survival was 11.5 months (range, 1-28) with a 33% 2-year survival compared to historical median survival estimates of spinal cord metastases due to solid tumors of 3 months. In secondary intramedullary spinal cord involvement of NHL early neurological morbidity is common, but overall survival compares favorably to previously reported survival in spinal cord metastases from solid tumors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据