4.5 Article

Early metabolic responses in temozolomide treated low-grade glioma patients

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY
卷 95, 期 1, 页码 87-93

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11060-009-9896-2

关键词

Low-grade glioma; Chemotherapy; Temozolomide; Positron emission tomography; Tyrosine

资金

  1. Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK)
  2. Essex Chemie AG, Luzern, Switzerland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Amino acid transport and protein synthesis are important steps of tumor growth. We investigated the time course of tumor metabolism in low-grade gliomas (LGG) during temozolomide chemotherapy, and compared metabolic responses as measured with positron emission tomography (PET) with volume responses as revealed by magnetic resonance imaging (MR). A homogeneous population of 11 patients with progressive non-enhancing LGG was prospectively studied. Imaging was done at 6-months intervals starting six months, and in a second series starting three months after treatment initiation. F-18 fluoro-ethyl-l-tyrosine (FET) uptake was quantified with PET as metabolically active tumor volume, and was compared with the tumor volume on MR. Response was defined as a parts per thousand yen10% reduction of the initial tumor volume. Eight patients showed metabolic responses. Already 3 months after start of chemotherapy the active FET volumes decreased in 2 patients to a mean of 44% from baseline. First MR volume responses were noted at 6 months. Responders showed a volume reduction to 31 +/- A 23% (mean +/- A SD) from baseline for FET, and to 73 +/- A 26% for MR. The time to maximal volume reduction was 8.0 +/- A 4.4 months for FET, and 15.0 +/- A 3.0 months for MR. The initial metabolic response correlated with the best volume response on MR (Spearman Rank P = 0.011). Deactivation of amino acid transport represents an early indicator of chemotherapy response in LGG. Response assessment based on MR only has to be reconsidered. The time window obtained from PET may assist for individual treatment decisions in LGG patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据