4.7 Article

An IoT-Oriented data placement method with privacy preservation in cloud environment

期刊

JOURNAL OF NETWORK AND COMPUTER APPLICATIONS
卷 124, 期 -, 页码 148-157

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnca.2018.09.006

关键词

loT; Data placement; Privacy; Energy consumption; Cloud

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [61702277, 61872219, 61772283]
  2. Startup Foundation for Introducing Talent of NUIST
  3. State Key Laboratory for Novel Software Technology, Nanjing University [KFKT2017B04]
  4. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD) fund
  5. Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center on Atmospheric Environment and Equipment Technology (CICAEET)
  6. project Six Talent Peaks Project in Jiangsu Province [XYDXXJS-040]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

IoT (Internet of Things) devices generate huge amount of data which require rich resources for data storage and processing. Cloud computing is one of the most popular paradigms to accommodate such IoT data. However, the privacy conflicts combined in the IoT data makes the data placement problem more complicated, and the resource manager needs to take into account the resource efficiency, the power consumption of cloud data centers, and the data access time for the IoT applications while allocating the resources for the IoT data. In view of this challenge, an IoT-oriented Data Placement method with privacy preservation, named IDP, is designed in this paper. Technically, the resource utilization, energy consumption and data access time in the cloud data center with the fat-tree topology are analyzed first. Then a corresponding data placement method, based on the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II), is designed to achieve high resource usage, energy saving and efficient data access, and meanwhile realize privacy preservation of the IoT data. Finally, extensive experimental evaluations validate the efficiency and effectiveness of our proposed method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据