4.7 Article

In-cluster vector evaluated particle swarm optimization for distributed regression in WSNs

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnca.2014.02.011

关键词

Distributed regression; Particle swarm optimization; Wireless sensor networks; Multiobjective optimization; Distributed optimization

资金

  1. Iran Telecommunication Research Center (ITRC) [17581/500]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Conventional methods address data modeling in WSNs by converting a learning problem into an optimization task. These methods are mainly based on Gradient Descent and Nelder-Mead Simplex optimization techniques. They are energy efficient, but with drawbacks: the accuracy of the induced models is usually lower than that of the centralized technique; and the latency is proportional to the network size. In this paper, we propose a novel distributed method for parametric regression in a clustered WSN using particle swarm optimization. Two main contributions of this paper are as follows: First, we re-formulate the distributed regression in WSNs as a multiobjective optimization (MO) problem in which an objective is dedicated to each cluster. Second, we propose a distributed algorithm based on the Vector Evaluated Particle Swarm Optimization method to address the MO problem in two phases. The proposed algorithm obtains a set of candidate network regressors and computes the final model using a weighted averaging rule. We compare the prediction accuracy, latency, and energy consumption of our algorithm against its popular distributed counterparts and the centralized technique using a real-world and an artificial data set. The experimental results show that our algorithm outperforms the existing approaches in prediction accuracy while its energy consumption and latency are acceptable. We also evaluate the effect of the number of particles, swarm topologies, and clustering granularity on the performance of the proposed method. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据