4.5 Article

Serum BAFF is elevated in patients with IgA nephropathy and associated with clinical and histopathological features

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEPHROLOGY
卷 26, 期 4, 页码 683-690

出版社

WICHTIG EDITORE
DOI: 10.5301/jn.5000218

关键词

BAFF; Histopathological phenotype; IgAN

资金

  1. Medical Scientific Research Foundation of Guangdong Province [A2011384]
  2. NSFC of Guangdong province [845100800400162]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81200509, 81100511, 30972766]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: B-cell-activating factor belonging to the tumor necrosis factor family (BAFF) has been found to have the function of activating B cells and participating in the class switching of B cells; however, its clinical application needs further study. In the present study, the serum BAFF levels of patients with IgA nephropathy (IgAN) with different histopathological phenotypes were measured. Methods: Levels of serum BAFF in 153 patients with IgAN, 55 healthy controls and 20 disease controls were recorded using commercially available ELISA kits. Their correlations with clinical and histopathological features of patients with IgAN were further evaluated. Results: Levels of serum BAFF in patients with IgAN were significantly higher than in controls. Serum BAFF levels were significantly higher in patients with mesangial hypercellularity and segmental glomerulosclerosis than in those without. Serum BAFF levels were associated with the severity of tubular atrophy/interstitial fibrosis. Serum BAFF levels were significantly positively correlated with estimated glomerular filtration rate and serum creatinine. Patients with elevated serum BAFF levels showed significantly greater severity in clinical and histopathological stages. Conclusion: Levels of serum BAFF were elevated in patients with IgAN and were associated with clinical and pathological features of the disease. Serum BAFF levels could be a noninvasive biomarker for monitoring disease severity of IgAN.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据