4.2 Article

Visible-near infrared hyperspectral imaging for the identification and discrimination of brown blotch disease on mushroom (Agaricus bisporus) caps

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEAR INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY
卷 18, 期 5, 页码 341-353

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1255/jnirs.894

关键词

mushrooms; Agaricus bisporus; brown blotch; Pseudomonas tolaasii; mechanical damage; visible-NIR hyperspectral imaging; PLS-DA

资金

  1. Irish Government Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food under the Food Institutional Research Measure (FIRM)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Brown blotch, caused by pathogenic Pseudomonas tolaasii, is the most problematic bacterial disease in Agaricus bisporus mushrooms. Although it does not cause any health problems, it reduces the consumer appeal of mushrooms in the market place, generating important economic losses worldwide. Hyperspectral imaging (HSI) is a non-destructive technique that combines imaging and spectroscopy to obtain information from a sample. The objective of this study was to investigate the use of HSI for brown blotch identification and discrimination from mechanical damage on mushrooms. Hyperspectral images of mushrooms subjected to (1) no treatment, (2) mechanical damage or (3) microbiological spoilage were taken during storage and spectra representing each of the classes were selected. Partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) was carried out in two steps: (1) discrimination between undamaged and damaged mushrooms and (2) discrimination between damage sources (i.e. mechanical or microbiological). The models were applied at a pixel level and a decision tree was used to classify mushrooms into one of the aforementioned classes. A correct classification of >95% was achieved. Results from this study could be used for the development of a sensor to detect and classify mushroom damage of mechanical and microbial origin, which would enable the industry to make rapid and automated decisions to discard produce of poor marketability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据