4.7 Article

Natural Product Libraries to Accelerate the High-Throughput Discovery of Therapeutic Leads

期刊

JOURNAL OF NATURAL PRODUCTS
卷 74, 期 12, 页码 2545-2555

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/np200673b

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [R01 CA 47135]
  2. NIH Fogarty International Center
  3. International Cooperative Biodiversity Groups [1U01TW008160-01]
  4. Agricultural Food Research Initiative of the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, USDA [35621-04750]
  5. Sandler Family Foundation
  6. California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A high-throughput (HT) paradigm generating LC-MS-UV-ELSD-based natural product libraries to discover compounds with new bioactivities and or molecular structures is presented. To validate this methodology, an extract of the Indo-Pacific marine sponge Cacospongia mycofijiensis was evaluated using assays involving cytoskeletal profiling, tumor cell lines, and parasites. Twelve known compounds were identified including latrunculins (1-4, 10), fijianolides (5, 8, 9), mycothiazole (11), aignopsanes (6, 7), and sacrotride A (13). Compounds 1-5 and 8-11 exhibited bioactivity not previously reported against the parasite T. brucei, while 11 showed selectivity for lymphoma (U937) tumor cell lines. Four new compounds were also discovered including aignopsanoic acid B (13), apo-latninculin T (14), 20-methoxy-fijianolide A (15), and aignopsane ketal (16). Compounds 13 and 16 represent important derivatives of the aignopsane class, 14 exhibited inhibition of T. brucei without disrupting microfilament assembly, and 15 demonstrated modest microtubule-stabilizing effects. The use of removable well plate libraries to avoid false positives from extracts enriched with only one or two major metabolites is also discussed. Overall, these results highlight the advantages of applying modern methods in natural products-based research to accelerate the HT discovery of therapeutic leads and/or new molecular structures using LC-MS-UV-ELSD-based libraries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据