4.2 Review

Biophysicochemical Perspective of Nanoparticle Compatibility: A Critically Ignored Parameter in Nanomedicine

期刊

JOURNAL OF NANOSCIENCE AND NANOTECHNOLOGY
卷 14, 期 1, 页码 402-414

出版社

AMER SCIENTIFIC PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1166/jnn.2014.8747

关键词

Nanoparticle; Biomedical Applications; Theranostic; Oxidative Stress; Nanomedicine

资金

  1. Department of Biomedical Engineering (BME), Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Engineered nanomaterials are increasingly used in domestic and commercial products due to the rapid growth and increasing public and industrial interests in nanotechnology. Undoubtedly there will be more exposure of living organisms and the environment to nanomaterials. Therefore, understanding the biophysicochemical interactions of nanoparticles with proteins, membranes, cells, DNA, and organelles at the nano-biointerface will help to control fundamental biological and dynamic colloidal forces to promote biocompatibility of the particles. In this article, we review how bio- and physicochemical surface characteristics at nanoscale govern particle biocompatibility for in vivo and in vitro models. We also revisit the promise and predictions gained from this understanding to design special types of nanoparticles, such as quantum dots (QDs) and superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs), for biomedical applications. This knowledge is essential not only from the perspective of safe use of nanomaterials, but also in paving the way for nontoxic interactions with biological systems. It paves the route for safe implementation of the materials in novel biomedical diagnostics and therapeutics. We also put forward an outlook and future perspective, which are largely ignored parameters in nanomedicine. In conclusion, emphasis on the systematic evaluation of nanomaterial toxicity in primary cells derived from vital organs and the need to develop an international consortium for a materialomics database is encouraged.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据