4.2 Article

Role of Solution pH on the Microstructural Properties of Spin Coated Cobalt Oxide Thin Films

期刊

JOURNAL OF NANOSCIENCE AND NANOTECHNOLOGY
卷 14, 期 6, 页码 4286-4291

出版社

AMER SCIENTIFIC PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1166/jnn.2014.8284

关键词

Cobalt Oxide; Thin Films; Structural Studies; Morphological Studies; Optical Properties; Electrical Properties

资金

  1. University Grants Commission (UGC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cobalt Oxide (Co3O4) thin films have been successfully coated onto glass substrates at various solution pH by sol-gel spin coating technique. The film thickness was estimated using weight gain method and it revealed that the film thickness increased with solution pH values. The prepared film structural, morphological, optical and electrical properties were studied using X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscope (SEM), UV-Vis-NIR spectrophotometer and Vander Pau method, respectively. The structure of the films were found to be face centered cubic with preferential orientation along (311) plane. X-ray line profile analysis was used to evaluate the micro structural parameters such as crystallite size, micro strain, dislocation density and stacking fault probability. The crystallite size values are increased with increase of solution pH values and maximum value of crystallite is estimated at 40.8 nm at solution pH 8 +/- 0.1. Morphological results showed that the pH of the solution has a marked effect on morphology of the Co3O4 thin films. The optical studies revealed that the band gap can be tailored between 2.16 to 2.31 eV by altering pH. The thin film formed at a solution pH 7 is found to have a low resistivity and high mobility. The electrical resistivity (rho), carrier concentration (n) and mobility (mu) values are 0.1 x 10(3) Omega.cm, 8.9 cm(2) gamma s(-1) and 6.6 x 10(14) cm(-3), respectively for Co3O4 thin film prepared at solution pH 7 +/- 0.1. EDAX studies showed that the cobalt content increased and the oxygen content decreased with increase of pH.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据