4.2 Article Proceedings Paper

Effect of Different Forms of Anionic Nanoclays on Cytotoxicity

期刊

JOURNAL OF NANOSCIENCE AND NANOTECHNOLOGY
卷 11, 期 2, 页码 1803-1806

出版社

AMER SCIENTIFIC PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1166/jnn.2011.3408

关键词

Anionic Nanoclays; Carbonate Form; Chloride Form; Stability; Cytotoxicity

资金

  1. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [10030036] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  2. Korea Institute of Industrial Technology(KITECH) [10030051] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [R31-2011-000-10010-0, 2008-313-F00130] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Anionic nanoclays, so-called layered double hydroxide (LDH) nanoparticles, have been extensively applied as drug delivery systems, since they efficiently enter cells via endocytosis pathway and possess controlled release property. However, the stability of LDHs varies, depending on the type of interlayer anions, which can also affect their toxicity. In this study, we investigated the effects of two different forms of LDH, carbonate form (MgAl-LDH-CO3) and chloride form (MgAl-LDH-Cl), on cytotoxicity in human lung epithelial cells. The result showed that MgAl-LDH-Cl was more easily dissolved into metal ions under simulated lysosomal (pH 4.5) and body fluid (pH 7.4) conditions than did MgAl-LDH-CO3. According to cytotoxicity evaluation, MgAl-LDH-CO3 exhibited high toxicity compared with MgAl-LDH-Cl in terms of induction of oxidative stress, apoptosis and membrane damage. These results suggest that easily dissoluble MgAl-LDH-Cl has low cytotoxicity, while high stability of MgAl-LDH-CO3 is correlated to elevated cytotoxicity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据