4.5 Article

Chloroquine-induced scratching is mediated by NO/cGMP pathway in mice

期刊

PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR
卷 134, 期 -, 页码 79-84

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2015.04.016

关键词

Scratching; Chloroquine; Nitric oxide; Cyclic GMP; Mice

资金

  1. Experimental Medicine Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran [93-04-30-25198]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chloroquine (CQ), a 4-aminoquinoline drug, has long been used in the treatment and prevention of malaria. However its side effect generalized pruritus contributes to treatment failures, and consequently results in the development of chloroquine resistant strains of Plasmodium falciparum. It was proposed that the administration of CQ correlated with increase in nitric oxide (NO) production. Nitric oxide is involved in some pruritic disorders such as atopic dermatitis, psoriasis and scratching behavior evoked by pruritogens like substance P. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the involvement of NO/cGMP pathway in CQ-induced scratching in mice. Scratching behaviors were recorded by a camera after intradermal (ID) injection of CQ in the shaved rostral back of the mice. The results obtained show that CQelicited scratching in a dose-dependent manner with a peak effective dose of 400 mu g/site. Injection of non-specific NOS inhibitor, N-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester or neuronal NOS selective inhibitor and 7-nitroindazole, reduced CQ-induced scratching significantly. On the other hand, administration of aminoguanidine as inducible NOS inhibitor has no inhibitory effect on this behavior. Also, injection of L-arginine as a precursor of NO significantly increased this response. Conversely, accumulation of cGMP by sildenafil as a selective phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor, potentiated the scratching behavior by al This study therefore shows that CQ-induced scratching behavior is mediated by the NO/cGMP pathway. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据