4.4 Article

Curcumin-sensitized TiO2 for enhanced photodegradation of dyes under visible light

期刊

JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH
卷 16, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11051-014-2336-z

关键词

Titanium dioxide photocatalyst; Curcumin; Dye sensitizer; Dye degradation; Visible light photodegradation; Energy conversion

资金

  1. Center of Excellent for Innovation in Chemistry (PERCH-CIC)
  2. Office of the Higher Education Commission, Ministry of Education
  3. Graduate School, Prince of Songkla University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Curcumin was coated on P25 TiO2 by using impregnation method from freshly prepared curcumin solution. The resulting products (Cur-TiO2-P25) was studied by several techniques such as X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, Fourier-transformed infrared spectroscopy, specific surface area by the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller method, and UV-Vis diffused reflectance spectroscopy. Experimental results revealed that impregnation of curcumin at 0.5, 3, 5, and 7 wt% did not affect the native phase of anatase and rutile in P25 significantly, however, it caused red shift of absorption onset in all curcumin-coated samples. The Cur-TiO2-P25 showed enhanced adsorption efficiency and increased photocatalytic activity under visible light with optimal result at 5 wt% curcumin content. Commercial anatase and rutile coated with curcumin (Cur-TiO2-an and Cur-TiO2-ru) were also prepared by the same method for the use in comparative studies of photodegradation of dyes. Cur-TiO2-an and Cur-TiO2-ru were also characterized with some selected equipment above but not as extensively as the Cur-TiO2-P25. Curcumin coating helped improve photocatalytic efficiencies of P25 and anatase but not for rutile. The mechanism of photocatalytic reaction was proposed that under visible light irradiation, curcumin molecule could act as dye sensitizing agent that injected electron into the conduction band of TiO2 leading to photodegradation of dyes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据