4.4 Article

One-pot aqueous-phase synthesis of ultra-small CdSe/CdS/CdZnS core-shell-shell quantum dots with high-luminescent efficiency and good stability

期刊

JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH
卷 15, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11051-013-1680-8

关键词

Core-shell-shell; One-pot synthesis; Water-dispersible quantum dots; Microwave synthesis; Good stability

资金

  1. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 program) [2007AA06Z418]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20577036, 20777058, 20977070]
  3. Hubei Biomass-Resource Chemistry and Environmental Biotechnology Key Laboratory [HBRCEBL2011-2012005]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [201120502020003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We describe the preparation and structural characterization of ultra-small water-dispersible CdSe semiconductor nanocrystal quantum dots (QDs), which are covered by a double-shell structure from CdS and CdZnS through a one-pot microwave-assisted synthesis technique. Because of the radial increase of the respective valence-and conduction-band offsets, the resulting core-shell-shell CdSe/CdS/CdZnS QDs are well electronically passivated, which endows them with high-fluorescence quantum yield of 90 % and high crystallinity, as was investigated by optical characterization, X-ray diffraction, high-resolution transmission electron microscopy, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Also, due to the stepwise adjustment of the lattice parameters in the radial direction, the obtained QDs display remarkable photostability, acid stability, and oxidation stability both in the aqueous solutions and the intracellular environment. The cytotoxicity experiment further substantiates the good biocompatibility of the core-shell-shell particles, though the size of the obtained QDs was very small (about 3.2 nm). This implied that the CdSe/CdS/CdZnS core-shell-shell QDs can be used as a promising candidate for fluorescent QDs-based biological applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据