4.4 Article

Effect of Er3+ doping on the thermal stability of TiO2 nanoparticulate xerogels

期刊

JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH
卷 15, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11051-013-1752-9

关键词

TiO2; Sol-gel; Erbium doping; Phase transformation

资金

  1. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad (Government of Spain) [MAT2012-31090, MAT 2010-16848]
  2. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas [JAE-Pre 083]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of Er3+ doping on the thermal stability of TiO2 nanoparticulate xerogels prepared by a colloidal sol-gel route was investigated. It was found that the as-synthesized xerogels crystallize as anatase phase with crystallite sizes in the low nanoscale range (<7 nm) and high-specific surface areas (>100 +/- 5 m(2)/g). Nevertheless, it was also found that the Er3+ cations are deposited on the surface of TiO2 nanocrystallites thus resulting in xerogels with smaller and more uniform nanoaggregates. Most importantly, detailed analyses using X-ray thermo-diffractometry together with selective analyses by transmission electron microscopy, selected area electron diffractometry, and X-ray energy-dispersive spectrometry showed that the thermal stability of these TiO2 nanoparticulate xerogels increases with increasing Er3+ doping. Specifically, the nanocrystallite growth is slowed down, the onset temperature of the anatase-to-rutile phase transformation is delayed, and the anatase phase is retained up to greater temperatures as the Er3+ content increases, which are all phenomena attributable to the formation at low temperatures (i.e. similar to 200 degrees C) of solid solutions with Er3+ solutes within the TiO2 host. Moreover, these solid solutions also have lower thermal expansion coefficient than the undoped crystal structure. Finally, Er3+ doping increasingly promotes the precipitation at high temperatures of Er2Ti2O7 from the rutile TiO2 solid solution, with the precipitation temperature decreasing with increasing Er3+ doping content.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据