4.4 Article

More efficient NIR photothermal therapeutic effect from intracellular heating modality than extracellular heating modality: an in vitro study

期刊

JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH
卷 14, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11051-012-1128-6

关键词

NIR; Cell uptake; Gold nanorods; Intracellular; Hyperthermia

资金

  1. National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [51025312]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [50830106, 21174126]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Supramolecular Structure and Materials [sklssm201204]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, efforts were placed in giving some in vitro key clues to the question on which is more efficient for the cancer hyperthermia between intracellular and extracellular modalities. Near infrared (NIR) photothermal responsive gold nanorods (GNRs) were adopted to cause cellular thermolysis either from inside or outside of cells. GNRs were synthesized with the size of 30.4 nm (in length) x 8.4 nm (in width). Demonstrated by ICP-MS (inductively coupled plasmon mass spectroscopy), UV-Vis spectroscopy and transmission electron microscopy analyses, various cell uptake doses of nanoparticles were differentiated due to different molecular designs on GNRs surfaces and different types of cells chosen (three cancer cell lines and three normal ones). Under our continuous wavelengths (CW) NIR irradiation, it resulted that the cells which internalized GNRs died faster than the cells surrounded by GNRs. Furthermore, fluorescent images and flow cytometry data also showed that the NIR photothermal therapeutic effect was greater when the amount of internalized GNRs per cell was larger. Generally speaking, the GNRs assisted intracellular hyperthermia exhibited more precise and efficient control on the selective cancer ablation. To a larger degree, such a relationship between GNRs distribution and hyperthermia efficiency might be applied to wider spectra of cell types and heat-producing nanoparticles, which provided a promise for future cancer thermal therapeutic designs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据