4.4 Article

Architectured Bi2S3 nanoflowers: photoenhanced field emission study

期刊

JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH
卷 14, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11051-012-0889-2

关键词

Bi2S3; Architectured; Film; Field emission; Photoenhanced; 3D nanostructures

资金

  1. Department of Information Technology (DIT), Delhi
  2. Board of College and University Development (BCUD) University of Pune

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present investigation, we demonstrate a facile hydrothermal/solvothermal route to fabricate elegant Bi2S3 nanoflowers in large scale with highly oriented (001) surfaces. The synthesis route was observed to radically determine the overall morphology of the resultant product. Under hydrothermal conditions (12 h), formation of Bi(2)S(3)flowers on nickel foil composed with the self-assembled tapered nanorods were obtained. Whereas after prolonged reaction time (24 h), formation of ultra long micro belts were observed. Interestingly, the architectured Bi2S3 flowers obtained by solvothermal route are seen to be composed with self assembled nanorods and it was also observed that the synthesis duration influences their shape, size, and areal density. Finding of such unique nanostructures on nickel foil arose by hydrothermal route exemplify a prominent photoenhanced field emission upon visible light illumination, which is attributed to the photoconductivity of Bi2S3. It is noteworthy that the field emission studies reveal low turn-on field of similar to 1.04 V/mu m, required to draw an emission current density of similar to 0.1 mu A/cm(2), which is found to be lower than the earlier reports. The average emission current is observed to be stable over the duration of 3 h. In addition, field emission behavior of a single Bi2S3 flower (pasted on a tungsten microtip) has also been investigated. The high sensitivity and fast response of photoenhanced emission current switching indicate the Bi2S3 nanoflowers as a promising candidate for micro/nano-optoelectronic devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据