4.4 Article

Tuning the cellular uptake and cytotoxicity of carbon nanotubes by surface hydroxylation

期刊

JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH
卷 13, 期 12, 页码 6941-6952

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11051-011-0603-9

关键词

Carbon nanotubes; Cell uptake; Cytotoxicity; Surface hydrophilicity; Radiolabeling; Environmental and health effects

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [10905086, 10975179]
  2. Shanghai Municipal Natural Science Foundation [08ZR1422700, 08JC1422600]
  3. ministry of Health [2009ZX10004-301]
  4. CAS
  5. MOST [2006CB705605]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multi-walled carbon nanotubes named CNTan, CNTox, and CNTir were prepared by high temperature annealing, acid oxidation and gamma irradiation, respectively. Their morphology, metal contents and surface properties were characterized by a series of techniques. The effects of surface hydrophilicity on their cell uptake efficiency and cytotoxicity were evaluated by radio-labeling techniques and several biological assays. Results showed that the CNTs possess similar diameters, lengths and metal contents, but different surface hydrophilicity. All of these CNT samples were readily taken up by Hela cells within 2 h, and their cell uptake ratio showed a positive correlation with their surface hydrophilicity in the following order: CNTir > CNTox > CNTan. Among these CNT samples, CNTan exhibited the lowest cytotoxicity to Hela cells due to its severe agglomeration. Although the cell uptake efficiency of CNTir was greater than that of CNTox, their cytotoxicity showed no significant difference, and other factors such as serum protein coating, and incubation time could also influence their cytotoxicity. These conclusions demonstrated that surface hydrophilicity of MWCNTs could alter their cell uptake efficiency, underlining the possibility for rational design of CNT-specific surface properties for their further development in biomedical fields and a mechanistic understanding of observed CNT toxicity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据