4.4 Article

Normal distribution based pseudo ML for missing data: With applications to mean and covariance structure analysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS
卷 100, 期 9, 页码 1900-1918

出版社

ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmva.2009.05.001

关键词

Asymptotic bias; Consistency; Estimating equation; Factor analysis; Sandwich-type covariance matrix; Not missing at random

向作者/读者索取更多资源

When missing data are either missing completely at random (MCAR) or missing at random (MAR), the maximum likelihood (ML) estimation procedure preserves many of its properties. However, in any statistical modeling, the distribution specification for the likelihood function is at best only an approximation to the real world. In particular, since the normal-distribution-based ML is typically applied to data with heterogeneous marginal skewness and kurtosis, it is necessary to know whether such a practice still generates consistent parameter estimates. When the manifest variables are linear combinations of independent random components and missing data are MAR this paper shows that the normal-distribution-based MILE is consistent regardless of the distribution of the sample. Examples also show that the consistency of the MILE is not guaranteed for all nonnormally distributed samples. When the population follows a confirmatory factor model, and data are missing due to the magnitude of the factors, the MILE may not be consistent even when data are normally distributed. When data are missing due to the magnitude of measurement errors/uniqueness, MLEs for many of the covariance parameters related to the missing variables are still consistent. This paper also identifies and discusses the factors that affect the asymptotic biases of the MLE when data are not missing at random. In addition, the paper also shows that, under certain data models and MAR mechanism, the MILE is asymptotically normally distributed and the asymptotic covariance matrix is consistently estimated by the commonly used sandwich-type covariance matrix. The results indicate that certain formulas and/or conclusions in the existing literature may not be entirely correct. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据