4.4 Article

Assessment of soil organic carbon stock in the upper Yangtze River basin

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOUNTAIN SCIENCE
卷 10, 期 5, 页码 866-872

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11629-012-2195-y

关键词

Soil; Organic carbon; Carbon stock; Yangtze River

资金

  1. Special Program of Strategic Science and Technology of Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA05050506]
  2. State Key and Basic Research Development Planning [2012CB417101]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of China [40901134]
  4. West Light Foundation of Chinese Academy of Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Soil organic carbon is of great importance to terrestrial ecosystems. Studies on the amount and spatial distribution of soil organic carbon stock in various types of soil can help to better understand the role of soil in the global carbon cycle and provide a scientific basis for the assessment of the magnitude of carbon stored in a given area. Here we present estimates of soil organic carbon stock in soils in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River based on soil types as defined by Chinese Soil Taxonomy and recently compiled into a digital soil database. The results showed that the total soil organic carbon stock of the upper Yangtze River to a depth of 100 cm was 1.452x10(13) kg. The highest soil organic carbon stock was found in felty soils (2.419x10(12) kg), followed by dark brown soils (1.269x10(12) kg), and dark felty soils (1.139x10(12) kg). Chernozems and irrigation silting soils showed the lowest soil organic carbon stock, mainly due to the small total area of such soils. The soil organic carbon density of these major soil types ranged from 5.6 to 26.1 kg m(-2). The average soil organic carbon density of the upper reaches of the Yangtze River was 16.4 kg m(-2), which was higher than that of the national average. Soil organic carbon density indicated a distinct decreasing trend from west to east, which corresponds to the pattern of increasing temperature from cold to subtropical.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据