4.1 Article

Are Abdominal Prolegs Serially Homologous With the Thoracic Legs in Panorpidae (Insecta: Mecoptera)? Embryological Evidence

期刊

JOURNAL OF MORPHOLOGY
卷 271, 期 11, 页码 1366-1373

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmor.10879

关键词

Mecoptera; proleg; homology; eruciform larva; embryogenesis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30670255]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is a long standing question whether the abdominal prolegs of holometabolous insect larvae are serially homologous with their thoracic legs. The histology and ultrastructure of proleg embryonic development in the scorpionfly Panorpa magna were studied using light and scanning electron microscopy. During the early embryonic development, paired primary abdominal appendages appeared laterally in line with the thoracic legs. Several hours later, a pair of proleg primordia arose along the midventral line on each of the first eight abdominal segments mesial to the primary abdominal appendages, which then ceased to grow and eventually degenerated into flat vestiges. Histological observation showed that the thoracic legs were obviously connected with lateral thoracic muscle cells, whereas the abdominal prolegs resembled secondary outgrowths. No apparent contact was observed between the lumen of abdominal prolegs and the hemocoel. After dorsal closure, each thoracic segment bore a pair of well-developed five-jointed legs, whereas the prolegs were unjointed, fleshy structure. The remnants of the primary abdominal appendages could still be clearly seen in the mature embryo. On the basis of the histological and morphological observation of the embryonic development, we confirm that the abdominal prolegs of Panorpidae lack the characters of the primary appendages; hence they are not serially homologous with the thoracic legs. The reasons why the primary abdominal legs are reduced in scorpionflies are briefly discussed. J. Morphol. 271:1366-1373, 2010. (C) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据