4.1 Article

Skating and diving:: Changes in functional morphology of the setal and microtrichial cover during ontogenesis on Aquarius paludum Fabricius (Hetoroptera, Gerridae)

期刊

JOURNAL OF MORPHOLOGY
卷 269, 期 6, 页码 734-744

出版社

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/jmor.10619

关键词

larval development; microtrichia; respiration; setae; waterproof

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We examined the morphology of setae and microtrichia in Aquarius paludum during larval development using a scanning electron microscope. We then conducted immersion experiments with larvae and adults in oxygenated and deoxygenated water. The adult water strider body is covered by a pilose double layer consisting of upper long setae (30-80 mu m) and lower filiform microtrichia (5-9 mu m). Only setae are present on the legs. Microtrichia on the larval body are very short: 0.5-0.6 mu m in first and second instars, and 0.8-1.7 mu m in third to fifth instars. Larval body setae are approximately as long as those of adults (25-50 mu m), but are much less dense at 1,800-5,750 setae per mm(2) versus 15,000-20,000 setae per mm(2) in adults. The density of setae on the legs remains relatively constant throughout development (larvae: 15,000-20,000 setae per mm(2); adults: 20,000-26,000 setae per mm(2)). Immersion experiments demonstrated that young instars may use cuticular respiration. First- and second-instar larvae survived underwater for several hours without a visible air supply, although they did not survive in deoxygenated water. We posit that the short body microtrichia have a waterproofing function in larvae, whereas they create a compressible air bubble in adults. In adults, waterproofing is accomplished by the setae. The density and length of setae on the legs of larvae was nearly the same as that on the body and legs of adults and is presumably optimized for waterproofing. Thus, a change in morphometrical parameters can result in a large functional change in the same structure. We discuss this interpretation in both ecological and physiological contexts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据