4.1 Article

TESTING RELATIONSHIPS AMONG THE VETIGASTROPOD TAXA: A MOLECULAR APPROACH

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLLUSCAN STUDIES
卷 78, 期 -, 页码 12-27

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mollus/eyr023

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [0334932, 0531757]
  2. Harvard Putnam Fellowship
  3. Malacological Society of London Research
  4. Harvard University Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences
  6. Division Of Environmental Biology [0531757] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Emerging Frontiers
  8. Direct For Biological Sciences [0334932] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Identifying the unambiguous members of Vetigastropoda and understanding the relationships among its families has been challenging. This study investigates the internal relationships among putative members of Vetigastropoda sensu lato (Fissurelloidea, Haliotoidea, Lepetelloidea, Lepetodriloidea, Pleurotomarioidea, Scissurelloidea, Seguenzioidea, Trochoidea, Angarioidea, Phasianelloidea, Neomphaloidea and Cocculinoidea) in a molecular phylogeny utilizing nearly 6 kb of molecular data from up to five nuclear and mitochondrial genes. Single-step parsimony-based and two-step maximum-likelihood analyses are employed as phylogenetic methods to analyse the data. Sequence data from all vetigastropod groups are included and in order to overcome shortfalls of previous vetigastropod analyses resulting from the under-sampling of outgroups, this study also includes broad outgroup representation. Fissurelloidea, Haliotoidea, Lepetodriloidea, Scissurelloidea, Seguenzioidea, Trochoidea, Angarioidea and Phasianelloidea formed a clade identified as Vetigastropoda sensu stricto united by morphological synapomorphies such as the presence of bursicles and epipodial sense organs. In contrast, Neomphalina, Cocculinoidea and Pleurotomarioidea fell outside Vetigastropoda s.s., indicating a need to reexamine the classification of these clades as vetigastropods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据