4.6 Article

Effect of graphene oxide on the structural and electrochemical behavior of polypyrrole deposited on cotton fabric

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR STRUCTURE
卷 1075, 期 -, 页码 486-493

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2014.07.025

关键词

Polypyrrole; Graphene oxide; Conducting textiles; Cotton

资金

  1. Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE), Malaysia through Fundamental Research Grant Scheme
  2. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia through Research University Grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Improving the electrical response of polypyrrole-cotton composite is the key issue in making flexible electrode with favorable mechanical strength and large capacitance. Flexible graphene oxide/cotton (GO/Cotton) composite has been prepared by dipping pristine cotton in GO ink. The composite's surface was further modified with polypyrrole (Ppy) via chemical polymerization to obtain Ppy/GO/Cotton composite. The composite was characterized using SEM, FTIR and XRD measurements, while the influence of GO in modifying the physicochemical properties of the composite was also examined using TG and cyclic voltammetry. The achieved mean particle size for Ppy/Cotton, Ppy/GO/Cotton and GO estimated using Scherrer formula are 58, 67 and 554 nm, respectively. FTIR spectra revealed prominent fundamental absorption bands in the range of 1400-1800 cm(-1). The increased electrical conductivity as much as 2.2 x 10(-1) S cm(-1) for Ppy/GO/Cotton composite measured by complex impedance, is attributed to the formation of continuous conducting network. The partial reduction of GO on the surface of cotton (GO/ Cotton) during chemical polymerization can also affect the conductivity. This simple, economic and environmental-friendly preparation method may contribute towards the controlled growth of quality and stable Ppy/GO/Cotton composites for potential applications in microwave attenuation, energy storage system, static electric charge dissipation and electrotherapy. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据