4.6 Article

Structural, magnetic, dielectric and optical properties of nickel ferrite nanoparticles synthesized by co-precipitation method

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR STRUCTURE
卷 1076, 期 -, 页码 55-62

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2014.07.048

关键词

Ferrites; Crystal structure; Optical properties; Dielectric properties; Magnetic properties

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nickel ferrite nanoparticles were synthesized by wet chemical co-precipitation method and the corresponding temperature dependent structural, magnetic and optical properties of these nanoparticles have been investigated. X-ray diffraction patterns show the single phase cubic spinal crystal structure belonging to the space group Fd3m. The average crystallite size varies in the range 8-20 nm with varying sintering temperature. Raman spectroscopy exhibits a doublet-like peak behaviour which indicates the presence of mixed spinel structure. The saturation magnetization, coercivity and remanence increase with increasing sintering temperature from 250 to 550 degrees C. The non-saturation and low values of magnetization at high fields indicate the strong surface effects to magnetization in NiFe2O4 nanoparticles. The g-value calculated from electron spin resonance spectrum indicates the transfer of divalent metallic ion from octahedral to tetrahedral site (i.e. mixed spinel structure). The dielectric permittivity, loss tangent and ac conductivity measurements show strong temperature dependence at all frequencies. The observed ac conductivity response suggests that the conduction in ferrite nanoparticles is due to feeble polaron hopping between Fe3+/Fe2+ ions. Room temperature UV vis diffuse spectra indicate that NiFe2O4 is an indirect band gap material with band gap ranges from 1.27 to 1.47 eV with varying sintering temperature. The photoluminescence study clearly indicates that the. Ni2+ ions occupy both octahedral and tetrahedral sites confirming mixed spinel structure. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据