4.6 Article

Exploring the effect of chain length of bridging ligands in cobalt(II) coordination polymers based on flexible bis(5,6-dimethylbenzimidazole) ligands: Synthesis, crystal structures, fluorescence and catalytic properties

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR STRUCTURE
卷 1051, 期 -, 页码 215-220

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2013.08.013

关键词

Catalytic property; Cobalt(II) coordination polymers

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two new Co(II) metal organic coordination polymers have been hydrothermally synthesized using flexible bis(5,6-dimethylbenzimidazole) ligands with varying chain lengths with 5-nitroisophthalic auxiliary ligand. 1 features a 1D looped-like chain consisting of two kinds of macrocycles alternately, and 2 possesses a 4-connected twofold interpenetrating diamond network structure. Moreover, the two compounds as a heterogeneous catalysts present high efficiency for the degradation of methyl orange dye in Fenton-like process. [GRAPHICS] Two Co(II) coordination polymers derived from a dicarboxylate and two flexible bis(5,6-dimethylbenzimidazole) ligands with varying chain lengths equipped, namely [Co(bdmbmm)(nip)](n)(1) and [Co-2(bdmbmb)(2)(niP)(2 center dot)H2O](n) (2) (bdmbmm = 1,1'-bis(5,6-dimethylbenzimidazole)methane, H(2)nip = 5-nitroisophthalic acid, bdmbmb = 1,4-bis(5,6-dimethylbenzimidazole)butane), have been synthesized by hydrothermal methods and characterized by elemental analyses, IR spectra, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) and single-crystal X-ray diffraction. Complex 1 forms a 1D looped-like chain consisting of two kinds of macrocycles, which is further arranged into a 2D supramolecular layer through face-to-face pi-pi stacking interactions; whereas complex 2 exhibits a 3D framework with a twofold interpenetrating diamondoid topology. The fluorescence and catalytic properties of the complexes for the degradation of methyl orange by sodium persulfate have been investigated. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据