4.5 Article

Intranasal H102 Peptide-Loaded Liposomes for Brain Delivery to Treat Alzheimer's Disease

期刊

PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH
卷 32, 期 12, 页码 3837-3849

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s11095-015-1744-9

关键词

H102 peptide; Liposome; Intranasal administration; Brain delivery; Alzheimer's disease (AD)

资金

  1. National Science and Technology Major Project [2009ZX09103-029]
  2. Open Project Program of Key Lab of Smart Drug Delivery (Fudan University), Ministry of Education, China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

H102, a novel beta-sheet breaker peptide, was encapsulated into liposomes to reduce its degradation and increase its brain penetration through intranasal administration for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD). The H102 liposomes were prepared using a modified thin film hydration method, and their transport characteristics were tested on Calu-3 cell monolayers. The pharmacokinetics in rats' blood and brains were also investigated. Behavioral experiments were performed to evaluate the improvements on AD rats' spatial memory impairment. The neuroprotective effects were tested by detecting acetylcholinesterase (AchE), choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) and insulin degrading enzyme (IDE) activity and conducting histological assays. The safety was evaluated on rats' nasal mucosa and cilia. The liposomes prepared could penetrate Calu-3 cell monolayers consistently. After intranasal administration, H102 could be effectively delivered to the brain, and the AUC of H102 liposomes in the hippocampus was 2.92-fold larger than that of solution group. H102 liposomes could excellently ameliorate spatial memory impairment of AD model rats, increase the activities of ChAT and IDE and inhibit plaque deposition, even in a lower dosage compared with H102 intranasal solution. H102 nasal formulations showed no toxicity on nasal mucosa. The H102-loaded liposome prepared in this study for nasal administration is stable, effective and safe, which has great potential for AD treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据