4.6 Article

FT-IR and Raman spectra, DFT and SQMFF calculations for geometrical interpretation and vibrational analysis of 3-nitro-p-toluic acid

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR STRUCTURE
卷 1022, 期 -, 页码 94-108

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2012.04.056

关键词

3-Nitro-p-toluic acid; HOMO and LUMO; NBO analysis; Eelectrostatic potential; Hyperpolarizability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) and FT-Raman of 3-nitro-p-toluic acid (NTA) have been recorded and analyzed. The equilibrium geometry, bonding features and harmonic vibrational frequencies have been investigated with the help of ab initio and density functional theory (DFT) methods. The assignments of the vibrational spectra have been carried out with the help of normal coordinate analysis (NCA) following the scaled quantum mechanical force field methodology (SQMFF). The optimized geometric bond lengths and bond angles obtained by computation show good agreement with experimental data of the relative compound. The computed dimer parameters also show good agreement with experimental data. The first hyperpolarizability (beta(0)) of this noval molecular system and related properties (beta, alpha(0), and Delta alpha) of NTA are calculated using B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) method on the finite-field approach. Stability of the molecule arising from hyperconjugative interactions, charge delocalization have been analyzed using natural bond orbital (NBO) analysis. The results show that charge in electron density (ED) in the sigma* and pi* antibonding orbital and second order delocalization energies E-(2) confirms the occurrence of intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) within the molecule. The calculated HOMO and LUMO energies also show that charge transfer occurs within the molecule. Finally the calculations results were applied to simulated infrared and Raman spectra of the title compound which show good agreement with observed spectra. Crown Copyright (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据