4.5 Article

The Evaluation of the Therapeutic Efficacy and Side Effects of a Macromolecular Dexamethasone Prodrug in the Collagen-Induced Arthritis Mouse Model

期刊

PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH
卷 33, 期 1, 页码 186-193

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s11095-015-1776-1

关键词

collagen-induced arthritis; ELVIS; glucocorticoid; HPMA copolymer; prodrug

资金

  1. National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases of the National Institutes of Health [R01 AR053325]
  2. Nebraska Arthritis Outcome Research Center (NAORC)
  3. University of Nebraska Medical Center

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To investigate the efficacy and safety of N-(2-hydroxypropyl) methacrylamide (HPMA) copolymer-dexamethasone conjugate (P-Dex) in the collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) mouse model. HPMA copolymer labeled with a near infrared fluorescence (NIRF) dye was administered to mice with CIA to validate its passive targeting to inflamed joints and utility as a drug carrier system. The CIA mice were treated with P-Dex, dexamethasone (Dex) or saline and the therapeutic efficacy and skeletal toxicity evaluated using clinical scoring and micro-computed tomography (mu-CT). The NIRF signal of the HPMA copolymer localized to arthritic joints consistent with its passive targeting to sites of inflammation. While the CIA mice responded more rapidly to P-Dex compared to Dex, the final clinical score and endpoint mu-CT analyses of localized bone erosions indicated that both single dose P-Dex and dose equivalent daily Dex led to comparable clinical efficacy after 30 days. mu-CT analysis of the proximal tibial metaphyses showed that P-Dex treatment was associated with significantly higher BMD and BV/TV compared to Dex and the saline control, consistent with reduced glucocorticoid (GC) skeletal toxicity. These results validate the therapeutic efficacy of P-Dex in the CIA mouse model. P-Dex treatment averted the adverse effects of GC's on systemic bone loss, supporting its utility in clinical development for the management of rheumatoid arthritis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据