4.6 Article

A complex study of 5-amino-3-methyl-4-[2-(5-amino-1,3,4-oxadiazolo)]-isoxazole monohydrate: A new low-molecular-weight immune response modifier

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR STRUCTURE
卷 999, 期 1-3, 页码 60-67

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2011.05.031

关键词

Isoxazole derivatives; X-ray structure analysis; Immunological activity; DFT; BSSE; Natural bond orbitals

资金

  1. State Committee for Scientific Research [KBN 3PO5F 01224]
  2. Wroclaw Center for Networking and Supercomputing (WCSS)
  3. Academic Computer Center [KBN/SGI/UWroc1/029/1998, KBN/SGI/UWroc1/078/2001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new potential lead structure with immunological activity, 5-amino-3-methyl-4-[2-(5-amino-1.3,4-oxadiazolo)]-isoxazole monohydrate, was synthesized. A detailed description of synthesis is presented together with X-ray structural analysis. In vitro assays showed that the compound had a potent immunosuppressive activity. Next, Density Functional Theory (OFT) was employed to shed a light on molecular properties of the investigated isoxazole derivative. The molecular modeling part included geometric as well as electronic structure descriptions: (i) the conformational analysis was performed to localize the most appropriate conformation; (ii) the coordination energy and Basis Set Superposition Error (BSSE) were estimated for the complex of the isoxazole derivative interacting with water molecule; (iii) the potential energy distribution was used to assign molecular vibrations, and NBO population analysis served to describe the electronic structure; (iv) the electrostatic potential map was generated to provide the graphical presentation of regions exposed for intermolecular interactions. The contacts between the water molecule and the nitrogen atom of the isoxazole ring edge were present in the solid phase. On the other hand, the theoretical DFT prediction was that the oxygen atom of the edge should form a more stable complex with the water molecule. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据