4.6 Article

Syntheses, structures and luminescent properties of silver(I) coordination polymers based on aminopyrimidyl derivatives and 1,2,3,4-butanetetracarboxylic acid

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR STRUCTURE
卷 975, 期 1-3, 页码 17-22

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2010.03.071

关键词

Silver(I); 2-Amino-4-methylpyrimidine; 2-Amino-4,6-dimethylpyrimidine; 1,2,3,4-Butanetetracarboxylic acid; Crystal structure; Photoluminescence

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20721001]
  2. MSTC [2007CB815301]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two mixed-ligand silver(I) coordination polymers (CPs) of the formula {[Ag-4(mapym)(2)(butca)(H2O)(4)]center dot 2H(2)O)(n) (1) and [Ag-4(dmapym)(6)(butca)center dot 2H(2)O](n) (2) (mapym = 2-amino-4-methylpyrimidine, dmapym = 2-amino-4,6-dimethylpyrimidine, H(4)butca = 1,2,3,4-butanetetracarboxylic acid) were prepared by reactions of Ag2O and 2-aminopyrimidyl ligands with H(4)butca under the ammoniacal condition. Both complexes were characterized by element analysis. IR and X-ray single-crystal diffraction. In 1, a pair of mu(2)-mapym ligands bind four Ag(I) ions to form [Ag-4(mapym)(2)] subunits which stack into one-dimensional (1D) chains via inter-subunit pi center dot center dot center dot pi interaction. The mu(6)-kappa(1):kappa(2):kappa(1):kappa(2)-butca ligands extend the 1D chains into a two-dimensional (2D) sheet which can be simplified into a 4(4)-sql net. When mapym was replaced by dmapym, we obtained 2 as a 10 chain incorporating mu(6)-kappa(1):kappa(2):kappa(1):kappa(2)-butca and mu(1)-dmapym ligands. The dimensions of 1-2 decrease from 20 to 10 mainly due to the steric effect of methyl groups. Additionally, the hydrogen-bonding, pi center dot center dot center dot pi and C-H center dot center dot center dot pi interactions also direct the self-assembly of supramolecular architectures. The photoluminescence properties of the 1 and 2 were investigated in the solid state at room temperature. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据