4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Precipitation of α-Fe2O3 from dense β-FeOOH suspensions with added ammonium amidosulfonate

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR STRUCTURE
卷 924, 期 -, 页码 235-242

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2008.10.011

关键词

beta-FeOOH; alpha-Fe2O3; Ammonium amidosulfonate; XRD; Mossbauer; FT-IR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Concentrated FeCl3 solutions containing starting concentrations 0.1, 0.01 or 0.001 M of ammonium amidosulfonate (AAS) were partially neutralized with concentrated NaOH solution and the dense suspensions so obtained were autoclaved at 160 degrees C for different times. Fine beta-FeOOH particles were formed at the beginning of the precipitation process and they transformed to alpha-Fe2O3 the through dissolution/recrystallization process. The transformation was monitored by XRD and Fe-57 Mossbauer spectroscopy. FT-IR spectra showed the presence of sulfate groups in the precipitates, which was interpreted as a consequence of the decomposition of amidosulfonate groups. For specific experimental conditions in the precipitates small amounts of alpha-FeOOH were found, as evidenced by FT-IR spectroscopy. The corresponding FE-SEM images confirmed the presence of alpha-FeOOH whiskers. FE-SEM also demonstrated the importance of the aggregation mechanism in the formation of peanut-type alpha-Fe2O3 particles, as well as in the formation of interconnected (with the neck) double cupolas. The last alpha- Fe2O3 particles were also porous and they consisted of linear chains of small alpha-Fe2O3 particles (also interconnected) which were directed from the center towards the Surface of cupola. EDS spectra showed a gradual decrease of sulfur content in the precipitates with a prolonged time of autoclaving. it was suggested that the preferential adsorption of sulfate groups oil selected planes was responsible for the elongation of the particles and formation of linear chains of small alpha-Fe2O3 particles (interconnected). (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据