4.2 Article

Kinetic and mechanistic differences in the interactions between caldendrin and calmodulin with AKAP79 suggest different roles in synaptic function

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR RECOGNITION
卷 25, 期 10, 页码 495-503

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jmr.2215

关键词

postsynaptic density; A-kinase anchoring protein; caldendrin; calmodulin; surface plasmon resonance; induced fit

资金

  1. European Union [FP7-People-ITN-2008-238055]
  2. DFG [SFB779, TPA08, TP B08, Kr1897/3-1]
  3. Leibniz Graduate School LGS
  4. Swedish Research Council (VR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The kinetic and mechanistic details of the interaction between caldendrin, calmodulin and the B-domain of AKAP79 were determined using a biosensor-based approach. Caldendrin was found to compete with calmodulin for binding at AKAP79, indicating overlapping binding sites. Although the AKAP79 affinities were similar for caldendrin (KD?=?20?n m) and calmodulin (KD?=?30?n m), their interaction characteristics were different. The calmodulin interaction was well described by a reversible one-step model, but was only detected in the presence of Ca2+. Caldendrin interacted with a higher level of complexity, deduced to be an induced fit mechanism with a slow relaxation back to the initial encounter complex. It interacted with AKAP79 also in the absence of Ca2+, but with different kinetic rate constants. The data are consistent with a similar initial Ca2+-dependent binding step for the two proteins. For caldendrin, a second Ca2+-independent rearrangement step follows, resulting in a stable complex. The study shows the importance of establishing the mechanism and kinetics of proteinprotein interactions and that minor differences in the interaction of two homologous proteins can have major implications in their functional characteristics. These results are important for the further elucidation of the roles of caldendrin and calmodulin in synaptic function. Copyright (c) 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据