4.2 Article

AFM imaging of extracellular polymer release by marine diatom Cylindrotheca closterium (Ehrenberg) Reiman & JC Lewin

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR RECOGNITION
卷 24, 期 3, 页码 436-445

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmr.1114

关键词

marine diatom; Cylindrotheca closterium; Ceratoneis closterium; extracellular polymer substance; polysaccharides; atomic force microscopy; Adriatic Sea

资金

  1. Croatian Ministry of Science, Education and Sports [0982934-2744, 098-0982705-2724]
  2. Croatian National Monitoring Program of the Adriatic Sea

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Extracellular polysaccharide production by marine diatoms is a significant route by which photosynthetically produced organic carbon enters the trophic web and may influence the physical environment in the sea. This study highlights the capacity of atomic force microscopy (AFM) for investigating diatom extracellular polysaccharides with a subnanometer resolution. Here we address a ubiquitous marine diatom Cylindrotheca closterium, isolated from the northern Adriatic Sea, and its extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) at a single cell level. We applied a simple procedure for AFM imaging of diatom cells on mica under ambient conditions (in air) to achieve visualization of their EPS with molecular resolution. The EPS represents a web of polysaccharide fibrils with two types of cross-linking: fibrils association forming junction zones and fibril-globule interconnections with globules connecting two or more fibrils. The fibril heights were 0.4-2.6 nm while globules height was in the range of 3-12 nm. Polymer networks of native gel samples from the Northern Adriatic and the network formed by polysaccharides extracted from the C. closterium culture share the same features regarding the fibril heights, pore openings and the mode of fibril association, proving that the macroscopic gel phase in the Northern Adriatic can be formed directly by the self-assembly of diatom released polysaccharide fibrils. Copyright (C) 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据