4.4 Article

Immunohistochemical Characteristics and Distribution of Neurons in the Paravertebral, Prevertebral and Pelvic Ganglia Supplying the Urinary Bladder in the Male Pig

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR NEUROSCIENCE
卷 52, 期 1, 页码 56-70

出版社

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12031-013-0139-9

关键词

Male pig; Urinary bladder; Immunohistochemistry; Sympathetic chain ganglia; Inferior mesenteric ganglia; Anterior pelvic ganglia; Neuropeptides

资金

  1. National Committee for Scientific Research Poland [NN 308 2334 38]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The distribution and chemical coding of neurons supplying urinary bladder in the male pig were studied in the sympathetic chain ganglia, inferior mesenteric ganglia and anterior pelvic ganglia. The combined retrograde tracing and immunohistochemistry for tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), dopamine beta-hydroxylase (DBH), neuropeptide Y (NPY), somatostatin (SOM), galanin (GAL), vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP), nitric oxide synthase (NOS), calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), substance P (SP), choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) and vesicular acetylcholine transporter (VAChT) were applied in the experiment. Bladder-projecting neurons were found in all the ganglia studied. The majority of sympathetic ganglia neurons (inferior mesenteric ganglia and sympathetic chain ganglia) expressed immunoreactivity (IR) to DBH. In sympathetic chain ganglia these neurons simultaneously expressed NPY, GAL or VAChT, while in inferior mesenteric ganglia they contained NPY, SOM and/or GAL. A small number of these bladder-projecting neurons was VAChT-IR and some contained NPY. In the pelvic ganglia bladder-projecting neurons formed two populations: DBH- and VAChT-IR. Some of DBH-IR neurons contained IR to NPY, SOM or GAL, while VAChT-IR neurons were NPY-, SOM- or NOS-IR. The results indicate that sympathetic ganglia contain mainly adrenergic neurons, while pelvic ganglia contain both adrenergic and cholinergic neurons. All these neurons contain typical combinations of neuropeptides.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据