4.4 Article

Effects of Chronic Stress on Prefrontal Cortex Transcriptome in Mice Displaying Different Genetic Backgrounds

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR NEUROSCIENCE
卷 50, 期 1, 页码 33-57

出版社

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12031-012-9850-1

关键词

Analgesia; Chronic mild stress; Gene expression; Microarray; Mouse; Pain; Prefrontal cortex; Transcriptome; Transthyretin

资金

  1. European Commission [LSHMCT-2004-503474]
  2. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education [IP2011 030371]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is increasing evidence that depression derives from the impact of environmental pressure on genetically susceptible individuals. We analyzed the effects of chronic mild stress (CMS) on prefrontal cortex transcriptome of two strains of mice bred for high (HA)and low (LA) swim stress-induced analgesia that differ in basal transcriptomic profiles and depression-like behaviors. We found that CMS affected 96 and 92 genes in HA and LA mice, respectively. Among genes with the same expression pattern in both strains after CMS, we observed robust upregulation of Ttr gene coding transthyretin involved in amyloidosis, seizures, stroke-like episodes, or dementia. Strain-specific HA transcriptome affected by CMS was associated with deregulation of genes involved in insulin secretion (Acvr1c, Nnat, and Pfkm), neuropeptide hormone activity (Nts and Trh), and dopamine receptor mediated signaling pathway (Clic6, Drd1a, and Ppp1r1b). LA transcriptome affected by CMS was associated with genes involved in behavioral response to stimulus (Fcer1g, Rasd2, S100a8, S100a9, Crhr1, Grm5, and Prkcc), immune effector processes (Fcer1g, Mpo, and Igh-VJ558), diacylglycerol binding (Rasgrp1, Dgke, Dgkg, and Prkcc), and long-term depression (Crhr1, Grm5, and Prkcc) and/or coding elements of dendrites (Crmp1, Cntnap4, and Prkcc) and myelin proteins (Gpm6a, Mal, and Mog). The results indicate significant contribution of genetic background to differences in stress response gene expression in the mouse prefrontal cortex.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据