4.4 Article

Suppression of c-Fos Protein and mRNA Expression in Pentylenetetrazole-Induced Kindled Mouse Brain by Isoxylitones

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR NEUROSCIENCE
卷 47, 期 3, 页码 559-570

出版社

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12031-011-9674-4

关键词

Epilepsy; Kindling; Isoxylitones; Delphinium denudatum; c-fos mRNA; c-Fos protein

资金

  1. Higher Education Commission, Pakistan [20-855/RND/07/540]
  2. Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) [S/228/2000]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An early immediate gene c-fos has been proposed as the gene responsible for turning on molecular events that might underlie the long-term neural changes occurring during kindling. We have evaluated the effects of novel anticonvulsant isomeric compounds isoxylitones [(E/Z)-2-propanone-1,3,5,5-trimethyl-2-cyclohexen-1-ylidine] on the c-Fos protein and mRNA expression in the brain samples of kindled mice and compared it with the normal and untreated kindled groups. Kindling was induced in male NMRI mice by repeated administration of sub-convulsive dose (50 mg/kg) of pentylenetetrazole (PTZ) until a seizure score of 4-5 was achieved. The c-Fos expression was quantified by combination of immunohistochemistry and RT-PCR protocols. Both the immunohistochemical and RT-PCR analysis revealed a marked increase in the expression of c-fos mRNA and protein in the brain regions tested in case of PTZ-kindled control group compared to normal control. In contrast, the isoxylitone (30 mg/kg)-treated group demonstrated significant reduction of c-Fos expression compared to PTZ-kindled control animals. However, low expression of c-fos mRNA was only detected in the thalamus of the isoxylitone-treated brain samples. Based on these observations, we suggest that isoxylitones may have the capacity to control the seizure pattern by mechanism such as the suppression of c-Fos protein and mRNA levels in different regions of the brain. Further investigations to explore the mechanism of action of these compounds are under process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据