4.4 Article

Pituitary Adenylate Cyclase-Activating Polypeptide is Protective Against Oxidative Stress in Human Retinal Pigment Epithelial Cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR NEUROSCIENCE
卷 43, 期 1, 页码 35-43

出版社

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12031-010-9427-9

关键词

ARPE-19; Apoptosis; Flow cytometry; Retinoprotection

资金

  1. Hungarian Science Research Fund OTKA [K72592, F67830, CNK78480, ETT278-04/2009]
  2. Bolyai Scholarship
  3. University of Pecs Medical School
  4. Richter Gedeon Foundation
  5. Science, Please! Research Teams on Innovation program [SROP-4.2.2/08/1/2008-0011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) is a neuropeptide with potent neurotrophic and neuroprotective effects. We have previously shown that PACAP protects against several types of retinal injuries in vivo, including retinal ischemia, glutamate-induced excitotoxicity, UV A-induced lesion, and diabetic retinopathy. We have also shown that PACAP activates antiapoptotic pathways and inhibits proapoptotic signaling in retinal lesions in vivo. PACAP receptors have been identified on the retinal pigment epithelial cells and PACAP has been shown to inhibit interleukin secretion from pigment epithelial cells. It is not known, however, whether PACAP is protective in these cells. Human retinal pigment epithelial cells (ARPE-19 cell line) were exposed to in vitro oxidative stress by hydrogen peroxide. Cell survival was decreased in cells exposed to oxidative stress, which could be significantly and dose-dependently attenuated by 10 pM-1 mu M PACAP treatment, as shown by MTT viability test. The protective effect of PACAP could be blocked by the receptor antagonist PACAP6-38. In addition, flow cytometry and JC-1 assay revealed that oxidative stress-induced apoptosis in retinal pigment epithelial cells could be decreased by PACAP treatment. In summary, these results show, for the first time, that PACAP is antiapoptotic in the retinal pigment epithelial cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据