4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Mechanisms of Neuroprotective Effects of Nicotine and Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors: Role of alpha 4 and alpha 7 Receptors in Neuroprotection

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR NEUROSCIENCE
卷 40, 期 1-2, 页码 211-216

出版社

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12031-009-9236-1

关键词

Nicotinic receptor; Acetylcholinesterase; Neuroprotection; Glutamate neurotoxicity; Up-regulation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neurotoxicity induced by glutamate and other excitatory amino acids has been implicated in various neurodegenerative disorders including hypoxic ischemic events, trauma, and Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases. We examined the roles of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) in survival of CNS neurons during excitotoxic events. Nicotine as well as other nicotinic receptor agonists protected cortical neurons against glutamate neurotoxicity via alpha 4 and alpha 7 nAChRs at least partly by inhibiting the process of apoptosis in near-pure neuronal cultures obtained from the cerebral cortex of fetal rats. Donepezil, galanatamine and tacrine, therapeutic acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitors currently being used for treatment of Alzheimer's disease also protected neuronal cells from glutamate neurotoxicity. Protective effects of nicotine and the AChE inhibitors were antagonized by nAChR antagonists. Moreover, nicotine and those AChE inhibitors induced up-regulation of nAChRs. Inhibitors for a non-receptor-type tyrosine kinase, Fyn, and janus-activated kinase 2, suppressed the neuroprotective effect of donepezil and galantamine. Furthermore, a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor also suppressed the neuroprotective effect of the AChE inhibitors. The phosphorylation of Akt, an effector of PI3K, and the expression level of Bcl-2, an anti-apoptotic protein, increased with donepezil and galantamine treatments. These results suggest that nicotine as well as AChE inhibitors, donepezil and galantamine, prevent glutamate neurotoxicity through alpha 4 and alpha 7 nAChRs and the PI3K-Akt pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据